Video Games in Artificial Intelligence Testing

 For decades, video games have served as laboratories for testing the capabilities of various AI algorithms. Whether they are classic platformers or more complex strategy games, these games provide a way for AI systems to learn how to act, adapt to changing environments, and optimize their decisions in order to earn rewards.

For example, the Hao AI Lab recently conducted experiments using Super Mario Bros. In these experiments, each AI model was required to generate Python code to control the game. The results showed that the models became increasingly proficient at planning complex maneuvers and developing various game strategies. In the tests, Claude 3.7 performed the best, followed by Claude 3.5, while reasoning models—such as OpenAI o1—performed particularly poorly.

The use of games offers several advantages for AI development:

  • Large Amounts of Data and Rapid Simulation: The abstract and relatively simple game mechanics enable AI models to simulate extensive gameplay in a short period. This is essential for reinforcement learning since the system continuously receives feedback on which actions lead to success.

  • Clear Goals and Rules: Clearly defined objectives in games (e.g., completing a level or defeating an enemy) help AI algorithms converge quickly and simplify performance measurement.

  • Controlled Environment: The simplified nature of games allows researchers to test learning processes in a controlled setting, which facilitates rapid experimentation and fine-tuning of methods.

Although games are excellent testing grounds, several experts have pointed out that the benchmarks provided by games do not necessarily reflect the complexity of the real world:

  • Lack of Generalizability: AI models are often optimized exclusively for the specific mechanics of a game, so even a slight change can result in significant performance degradation. For example, in the Super Mario Bros. experiments, timing is crucial, and "step-by-step reasoning" models (like OpenAI o1) frequently fail to execute the required actions quickly enough.

  • Oversimplified Environment: Although games effectively simulate certain aspects of AI decision-making, many real-life social and economic interactions involve numerous additional dimensions and variables that games cannot adequately represent.

  • Issues with Metrics: Success in games is often overestimated. As experts such as Richard Socher and Mike Cook have noted, game-based benchmarks do not always provide a comprehensive picture of whether an AI system is capable of genuine, human-level problem solving.

The AI Benchmark Crisis

Recently, an increasing number of researchers have questioned the relevance of existing AI benchmarks—not just those established through games. Andrei Karpathy, a former researcher and founding member of OpenAI, is one of the most prominent critics. In a brief post on X, he stated that he no longer trusts any of the current benchmarks. Other experts, such as Richard Socher, founder of You.com, and Noam Brown, who has developed AI systems that excel in games (e.g., poker), view game-based testing as problematic. They argue that games provide an overly simplified environment that fails to capture the complex, long-term decision-making processes of real life.

Conclusions

The rapid development of artificial intelligence makes it challenging to keep pace with evolving benchmarks, leaving many researchers uncertain about the credibility of the test data. One reason for this crisis of confidence is that many tests rely on outdated measurement practices, such as game-based testing. At the same time, there is an increasing need for robust benchmarks because without them it is difficult to determine whether AI developments are moving in the right direction or which model is superior. It is no wonder that Scale AI—originally focused on data labeling—has experienced rapid growth as it has shifted to verifying the accuracy of AI systems and validating the correctness of their decisions. Their success, alongside the current crisis of confidence, demonstrates that there is an immediate, lucrative market opportunity in this field. 

Share this post
Artificial intelligence, space, and humanity
Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX, Tesla, Neuralink, and xAI, shared his thoughts on the possible directions of the future in a recent interview, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, space exploration, and the evolution of humanity.
Real-time music composition with Google Magenta RT
The use of artificial intelligence in music composition is not a new endeavor, but real-time operation has long faced significant obstacles. The Google Magenta team has now unveiled a development that could expand both the technical and creative possibilities of the genre. The new model, called Magenta RealTime (Magenta RT for short), generates music in real time and is accessible to anyone thanks to its open source code.
Ufficio Zero is an Italian Linux distribution for sustainable digital work
Ufficio Zero Linux OS is a little-known but increasingly noteworthy Italian-developed operating system. It is primarily designed for office and administrative work environments and may be of particular interest to those looking for a stable, reliable, and long-term alternative to commercial systems. Ufficio Zero occupies a unique place in the world of open source systems: it aims to provide a solution to both the obsolescence of digital infrastructure and the problems of accessibility of software tools that are essential for work.
What would the acquisition of Perplexity AI mean for Apple?
Apple has long been trying to find its place in the rapidly evolving market of generative artificial intelligence. The company waited strategically for decades before directing significant resources into artificial intelligence-based developments. Now, however, according to the latest news, the Cupertino-based company may be preparing to take a bigger step than ever before: internal discussions have begun on the possible acquisition of a startup called Perplexity AI.
This is how LLM distorts
With the development of artificial intelligence (AI), more and more attention is being paid to so-called large language models (LLMs), which are now present not only in scientific research but also in many areas of everyday life—for example, in legal work, health data analysis, and computer program coding. However, understanding how these models work remains a serious challenge, especially when they make seemingly inexplicable mistakes or give misleading answers.
MiniMax-M1 AI model, targeting the handling of large texts
With the development of artificial intelligence systems, there is a growing demand for models that are not only capable of interpreting language, but also of carrying out complex, multi-step thought processes. Such models can be crucial not only in theoretical tasks, but also in software development or real-time decision-making, for example. However, these applications are particularly sensitive to computational costs, which are often difficult to control using traditional approaches.

Linux distribution updates released in the last few days