Tesla’s Head of Robotics, Milan Kovac, Departs Amid Critical Phase for Optimus Project

Tesla has entered a critical phase in its robotics development as Milan Kovac, the vice president and head of engineering for the Optimus humanoid robot division, has officially left the company. His departure, announced publicly on June 6, 2025, through a post on X (formerly Twitter), comes at a time when the company is focusing heavily on the Optimus project, a central pillar in its long-term strategic goals.

Kovac, who spent nearly a decade at Tesla, played a pivotal role in both the Autopilot and Optimus programs. In his announcement, he attributed his decision to a personal need to spend more time with family overseas. He made clear that his resignation had no connection to internal conflicts, political disagreements, or recent public controversies involving CEO Elon Musk. Expressing deep gratitude, Kovac reaffirmed his unwavering support for Musk and the Tesla team, highlighting the strength of their ongoing relationship.

Following his resignation, responsibility for the Optimus program will pass to Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s vice president of AI software and current leader of the Autopilot division. No further statements have been released by Elluswamy or the company regarding the specifics of the transition.

This leadership change arrives as Tesla seeks to ramp up production of the Optimus robot, which Elon Musk has referred to as the company’s most important product under development. The production goal for this year includes thousands of units, with a longer-term vision targeting tens of thousands by 2026. Musk has suggested that the success of Optimus could play a transformational role in achieving Tesla’s valuation ambitions, possibly elevating it to a $25 trillion company. However, such projections remain uncertain, given the early stage of development and persistent production hurdles, including challenges with sourcing rare-earth magnets from China.

Tesla’s increasing focus on robotics comes amid a broader context of slowing electric vehicle sales and intensifying competition from established and emerging players in both the automotive and robotics industries. Companies like Boston Dynamics, Agility Robotics, and Figure have become formidable rivals, some even attracting former Tesla engineers, adding further complexity to Tesla’s pursuit of leadership in the sector.

Despite these challenges, both Musk and Kovac publicly recognized each other’s contributions. Musk praised Kovac’s impact over the past decade, while Kovac maintained that his exit would not hinder Tesla’s broader goals. This shift in leadership adds a new layer of uncertainty at a moment when the company is relying more heavily on automation and AI to shape its future direction. 

Share this post
After a Historic Turn, SK Hynix Becomes the New Market Leader in the Memory Industry
For three decades, the name Samsung was almost synonymous with leadership in the DRAM market. Now, however, the tables have turned: in the first half of 2025, South Korea’s SK Hynix surpassed its rival in the global memory industry for the first time, ending a streak of more than thirty years. This change signifies not just a shift in corporate rankings but also points to a deeper transformation across the entire semiconductor industry.
Neuralink’s Rivals Are Already in the Clinic – Europe’s Answer to Musk’s Brain Chips
While Silicon Valley is loud with the hype surrounding brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), attention often centers on one high-profile name: Elon Musk’s Neuralink. Behind the scenes, however, Europe is quietly yet determinedly building its own neurotechnological future. Startups across the continent are not merely following trends—they are shaping the market with unique solutions, often rooted in practical medicine and materials science. This raises the question: in the shadow of flashy American marketing, can Europe’s quieter innovation achieve real breakthroughs and take a leading role in this revolutionary field?
NVIDIA Driver Support Changes – The Clock Is Ticking for the GTX 900–10 Series
NVIDIA has announced a major shift in its driver support strategy. This decision affects millions of users, but what does it actually mean in practice? Is it really time for everyone to consider upgrading their hardware, or is the situation more nuanced? Understanding the implications is key to staying prepared for the technological changes of the coming years.
This Is What the Google Pixel 10 Might Look Like — But Do We Really Know Everything Yet?
The Google Pixel series, known for its clean software and outstanding photography capabilities, is reaching its 10th generation this year. Ahead of the official launch, expected on August 20, a wealth of information and rumors is already circulating online, outlining a device family that may not bring dramatic visual changes but instead introduces real, tangible innovations under the hood. But are these improvements enough for the Pixel 10 to stand out in an increasingly crowded market?
The Chinese-American Robotics War
The global robotics industry is at an unprecedented turning point as China and the United States engage in increasingly intense competition for dominance in the field of humanoid robotics. This is more than just a technological rivalry—it represents a fundamental struggle for leadership in the next phase of industrial automation. As Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, puts it, “We are number one, but Chinese companies occupy second and tenth place,” accurately reflecting deep concerns about Chinese manufacturing capabilities and their strategic position in the robotics sector.
Tesla's new FSD chip delivers five times more computing power
Tesla's next-generation FSD (Full Self-Driving) chip, the AI5/HW5, represents a significant step forward in the development of the company's self-driving technology. Although the previous model, known as HW4, already offered powerful performance on its own, the new chip's 2000-2500 TOPS (tera operations per second) computing power effectively sets a new standard for in-vehicle artificial intelligence applications. This fivefold increase is not just a technical feat, but also allows the system to work with more complex, finely tuned algorithms that require less human intervention – algorithms that bring us closer to the possibility of completely unsupervised driving.